RESUMO
OBJETIVO Comparar los resultados clínicos, funcionales e imagenológicos de dos técnicas quirúrgicas para el manejo de fracturas conminutas de patela: con y sin eversión patelar. MÉTODOS En una serie de casos retrospectivos de fracturas conminutas de patela tratadas en el mismo centro entre 2014 y 2017, con un seguimiento ≥ 3 meses, se hizo una comparación entre el grupo con eversión y el grupo sin eversión. Los criterios de exclusión fueron patelectomía parcial o total, reinserción tendínea, o rehabilitación incompleta. Las variables analizadas fueron edad, sexo, tabaquismo, diabetes mellitus, energía del accidente, tipo de fractura, variables quirúrgicas (banda de tensión, tornillos, alambres, nudos, cerclaje circular), rango de movimiento (RDM) articular postoperatorio, presencia de osteosíntesis sintomática, puntaje de escalas funcionales (de Tegner-Lysholm y de Kujala) al alta definitiva, complicaciones (rigidez articular, infección, trombosis venosa profunda), y variables imagenológicos con tomografías computarizadas pre- y postoperatorias (brecha, desnivel articular > 2 mm, elementos de fijación intraarticular). RESULTADOS En total, 20 de 22 pacientes, 13 con eversión y 7 sin eversión, cumplieron con los criterios de selección. El seguimiento fue de 3 a 12 meses, y no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas respecto a las variables demográficas entre ambos grupos, lo cual los hace comparables. Destacaron el tiempo desde el ingreso al alta, con 7 meses para los pacientes con eversión y 5 meses para los sin eversión (p = 0.032), la proporción de pacientes con desnivel articular > 2 mm, con 7.7% para los con eversión y 14.3% para los sin eversión (p = 0.016), y una tendencia a resultados superiores en escalas funcionales para el grupo con eversión. CONCLUSIÓN El tratamiento de fracturas conminutas de patela con eversión parece ser una alternativa viable dados sus resultados imagenológicos y funcionales superiores a los de la técnica habitual.
PURPOSE To compare the clinical, functional and imaging outcomes of two surgical techniques for the treatment of comminuted patellar fractures: with and without eversion. METHODS In a retrospective series of cases of comminuted patellar fractures treated at a single center between 2014 and 2017, with a follow-up 3 months , we performed a comparison between the eversion group and the non-eversion group. The exclusion criteria were partial or total patellectomy, tendon reinsertion, or incomplete rehabilitation. The variables analyzed were age, gender, smoking, diabetes mellitus, the energy of the accident, the fracture type, surgical variables (tension band, screws, wires, knots, circular cerclage), postoperative joint range of motion (ROM), presence of symptomatic osteosynthesis, the scores on the functional scales (of Tegner-Lysholm and of Kujala) at the final discharge, complications (joint stiffness, infection, deep vein thrombosis), and pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging variables (gap, step-off > 2mm, intra-articular fixation elements). RESULTS In total, 20 out of 22 patients, 13 undegoing eversion and 7 not undergoing eversion, met the selection criteria.. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months, and there were no statistically significant differences regarding the demographic variables between both groups, which makes them comparable. The most remarkable results were the time from admission to final discharge, of 7 months for the patients in the eversion group, and of 5 months for those in the non-eversion group (p » 0.032), the proportion of patients with a step-off > 2 mm, with 7.7% for the eversion group and 14.3% for the non-eversion group (p » 0.016), and a tendency towards higher scores in the functional scales for the eversion group. CONCLUSION The treatment of comminuted patellar fractures with eversion seems to be a viable alternative, given its superior imaging and functional results compared to those of the usual technique.
Assuntos
Humanos , Patela/cirurgia , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Patela/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas Cominutivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos OrtopédicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tension band plates (TPBs) are frequently used in guided growth (CG) surgeries. Recently, the concept of removing the metaphyseal screw only to stop the growth modulating effect rather than completely removing the implant, has gained popularity. Although this strategy would have certain potential advantages, the associated risks are unknown. The aim of this study is to report the experience of three institutions with this strategy. METHODS: A database was compiled with the demographic information of patients treated by guided growth using TBPs between January 2014 and January 2019 at three institutions. The cases where only the metaphyseal screw was removed were identified. The records were reviewed to analyze the indications, demographic data, characteristics of the procedure, complications and need for additional procedures. RESULTS: We reviewed 28 partial hardware removals, performed in 10 patients (all male). Initial surgery was indicated for angular deformity (N = 6), and leg-length discrepancy (N = 4). The average age at the time of surgery was 9.5 ± 2.9 years (range 4 to 13 years). Three procedures were performed on the distal femur, 3 on the proximal tibia, 2 on the distal tibia, and 20 combined. The average follow-up was 23.3 ± 11 months (range 12 to 52 months). We observed recurrence of deformities in 7 of 28 (22%) limbs that required re-insertion of the metaphyseal screw. Two patients presented complications from the procedure: soft tissue irritation (N = 1) and angular deformity (N = 1). Both patients required unplanned surgery. DISCUSSION: Partial hardware removal in guided growth surgery could favor the presentation of complications. The benefits of this strategy must be considered against the possible undesired effects generated by its application. STUDY DESIGN: Therapeutic study (Level IV).
RESUMO
Objective: There are many different techniques for finger arthrodesis our purpose is to compare the results of metarcophalangeal (MP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis, with tension band wire technique vs compression screw. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with arthrodesis of the MP and PIP joint between 2006 and 2009, with a tension band wire technique (N = 28) and Mini-Acutrak screw (N = 29). We compared rates and times of union and the incidence of complications. Results: The union rate of the tension band group was 92.9 percent and 85.7 percent for the screw group, at 9.4 and 9.8 weeks respectively. The complications rate was 28.6 percent for tension band wire technique and 27.6 for the screw technique. The reoperation rate was 32.1 percent for the tension band wire technique and 3.6 percent for the screw group, with remove of 25 percent of the tension band. Discussion: Both surgical techniques had a similar rate of union and complications, but with significantly more re-operation to remove implants in the tension band group, which is an important factor to consider when choosing the surgical technique.
Objetivo: Existen múltiples técnicas de atrodesis de dedos, por lo que nuestro objetivo es compara resultados de artrodesis de metacarpofalángicas e interfalángicas proximales de los dedos mediante banda de tensión vs tornillo compresivo. Material y Método: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, comparativo, de pacientes operados de artrodesis interfalángica proximal o metacarpofalángica de lo dedos primarias entre los años 2006 y 2009. Se analizaron 28 pacientes con banda de tensión y 29 con técnica de tornillo compresivo sin cabeza Mini-Acutrak, comparando tasas y tiempos de consolidación e incidencia de complicaciones. Resultados: Se obtuvo una tasa de consolidación de 92,9 por ciento para el grupo banda de tensión y 85,7 por ciento para el grupo de tornillos, a las 9,4 y 9,8 semanas respectivamente (sin diferencia significativa para ambas variables). La tasa de complicaciones fue de 28,6 por ciento para la bandea de tensión y de 27,6 por ciento para la técnica con tornillo. La tasa de reoperaciones fue de 32,1 por ciento para la técnica con banda de tensión y de 3,6 por ciento con tornillo, determinado por el 25 por ciento de las bandas de tensión, sin haber retiro de tornillos. Discusión; Ambas técnicas quirúrgicas muestran una similar tasa de consolidación y complicaciones, pero existe unna significativa mayor tasa de reoperaciones para el retiro de material de osteosíntesis en el grupo de banda de tensión, lo cual es un factor importante a considerar en la elección de la técnica quirúrgica, siendo en este sentido, el tornillo una mejor opción.
